Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Vol : 16 - Issue : 5 ; 447–452
Chandrmauli Chaurasiya*1, G. P. Singh2, Surendra Kumar Gupta3 and A. Pagati Priya4
1 P. G. Scholar, Department of Agricultural Economics, IANS Deen Dayal Upadhayay Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur - 273 009, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, IANS Deen Dayal Upadhayay Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur - 273 009, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, IANS Deen Dayal Upadhayay Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur - 273 009, Uttar Pradesh, India
4 P. G. Scholar, Department of Agricultural Economics, IANS Deen Dayal Upadhayay Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur - 273 009, Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract
The present study was conducted during 2023-24 in four banana-growing villages of Gorakhpur district, namely Ramchaura, Campiernagar, Sonaura Khurd, and Sonaura Bujurg, using a sample of 80 farmers selected through random sampling across marginal, small, medium, and large farm categories. Data were collected through pre-tested schedules and analyzed using percentage and cost–return approaches. Results indicated that the average yield per hectare was highest in large farms (197.83 qt) followed by medium (195.03 qt), small (193.85 qt), and marginal farms (184 qt). However, higher yields in large farms were offset by increased cultivation costs (Rs. 109181.17/acre) and greater dependence on hired labor, resulting in the highest cost of production per quintal (Rs. 551.89). In contrast, marginal and small farms benefitted from lower input use and family labor, achieving relatively better cost efficiency with lower production costs (Rs. 487.30 and Rs. 492.62/qt, respectively). Profitability indicators such as net returns, family labor income, and farm investment income confirmed the overall viability of banana cultivation, though the benefit–cost ratio was slightly more favorable for marginal (1:3.20) and small farms (1:3.10) compared to medium (1:2.70) and large farms (1:2.69). Despite its profitability, banana farming in Gorakhpur faces several critical constraints, the foremost being abiotic stresses such as wind and drought (93.75%), high price of planting materials (87.50%), labor scarcity (70%), and poor marketing infrastructure (67.50%). Financial constraints, including lack of credit facilities (66.25%) and inadequate insurance coverage (62.50%), alongside limited technical knowledge (45%), further restrict productivity and profitability. The study concludes that while banana farming is economically rewarding, its sustainability is undermined by systemic challenges across production, finance, and marketing. Policy interventions such as the provision of affordable disease-free planting materials, access to institutional credit and insurance, farmer training on improved production practices, and strengthening of storage and market infrastructure are imperative to enhance profitability and ensure long-term viability of banana cultivation in the region.
Chandrmauli Chaurasiya*1, G. P. Singh2, Surendra Kumar Gupta3 and A. Pagati Priya4
Click here to download file
Research Article | Published online : 08-Sep-2025